The Remediation Technology Summit

February 26-28, 2019

Colorado Convention Center
Denver, CO

colganGary Colgan
Vice President / Characterization Practice Leader

Gary Colgan, PG, CGWP Vice President/Characterization Practice Leader CH2M-Salt Lake City Gary is a hydrogeologist/geochemist for CH2M where he serves as Senior Technical Consultant for a variety of site characterization, soil and groundwater remediation, groundwater resource development, and environmental permitting projects for government and private sector clients globally. He is currently technical leader for two large performance based remediation projects for the U.S. Air Force in Utah and Alaska, accelerating progress toward site closeout while making remediation more sustainable. As a technology manager, he serves as Characterization Practice Leader, stewarding CH2M’s Hydrogeology, Groundwater Modeling, Chemistry, Geochemistry, Field Characterization Methods, and Fractured Rock and Karst communities of practice. Gary has over 30 years of experience since receiving his BS in Geology from the University of Utah and an MS Geosciences emphasizing hydrogeology and isotope geochemistry from the University of Arizona.

SESSION CHAIR & KEYNOTE - Getting It Straight: Defensible Data

Collecting Defendable Environmental Data: What Does That Mean?

There are many aspects to collecting defendable data including technical, regulatory and legal. The first question to ask is: Why are you collecting the data? Understanding the purpose of the data collection effort is the first step in identifying the proper framework(s) for collecting the data. Technical frameworks include industry best practices such as ASTM and ITRC guidance. Regulatory frameworks include a wide variety of federal, state and local laws and regulations, and associated guidance. The legal framework must consider appropriate technical and regulatory framework relevant to the legal issue, but data collection often must be performed to an even higher standard to withstand intense legal scrutiny. The human factor is probably the most important part of the equation. No matter how good the work planning, field staff must have the proper training and project background to understand not just the “What,” “Where” and “How” but the “Why” so they can properly adapt to observed conditions to collect defendable, high quality data.